Ace Property & Casualty Insurance v. Vegas VP, LP

MEMORANDUM **

Vegas VP, LP appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Ace Property and Casualty Insurance Company (“Ace”). The district court held that Vegas VP’s costs of delay were *233not a covered peril under Exclusion S of the policy. We affirm.

As a threshold matter, we conclude that Ace’s submissions in response to the order to show cause demonstrate that the district court had diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). Therefore, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1653, the court amends the pleadings nunc pro tunc to reflect that Vegas VP has one partner, Portland…