Legal Opinion

Delk v. Gill

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 9, 1969No. 42095PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BLACKBIRD, Justice.

Defendant in error, hereinafter referred to as "plaintiff”, obtained a verdict and judgment for damages in the sum of $10,-200.00 against plaintiff in error, a Tulsa dentist, hereinafter referred to as “defendant”, on account of her personal injuries, pain and suffering, etc., allegedly caused by defendant, in ostensibly attempting to relieve a post-operative condition in plaintiff’s mouth, after his extraction of her lower, right, first molar tooth.

In his present appeal, defendant asserts that the trial court erred in overruling his challenges to the sufficiency of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hunt v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1940
  2. Cohenour v. SmartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
  3. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. KellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Harder v. F.C. Clinton, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  2. Martin v. StrattonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
  3. Robertson v. LaCroixCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
  4. Beetle Plastics v. TomlinsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1979
  5. Martin v. StrattonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API