Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Boston v. Tuckness

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 13, 1998No. WD 53679PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ULRICH, Chief Judge.

Robert David Tuckness appeals the trial court’s order modifying his child support obligation. He claims that substantial evidence to support the trial court’s finding of changed circumstances was not presented. He also claims that the trial court abused its discretion in ordering him to pay child support retroactive to February 1, 1996.1 The judgment of the trial court is reversed, and the case is remanded.

*326The marriage of Robert Tuckness (Father) and Cynthia Lee Tuckness (Mother) was dissolved by Decree of Dissolution on November 16, 1987. An order modifying the custody…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. McMickle v. McMickleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Pritchard v. PritchardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. General Electric Capital Corp. v. RauchMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. BACKMAN v. GELBMANCourt of Appeals of Nevada · 2025
  3. Bauer v. AngellMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Haeffner v. HaeffnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API