Legal Opinion
Adams v. California Department of Health Services
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 7, 2007No. 05-56857PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Plaintiff-Appellant Avril Adams appeals the district court’s grant of partial summary judgment to Defendants-Appellees California Department of Health Services *592(“CDHS”), La Vonne Coen, and Donnata Moreland in this employment discrimination and retaliation action. Adams also appeals the judgment entered against her following a jury trial and the district court’s denial of her request for declaratory relief. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
The district court properly exercised its discretion in denying Adams’s motion to amend. Adams delayed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Amerisourcebergen Corporation v. Dialysist West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Lockheed Martin Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Network Solutions, Inc., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- H.N. Dang v. Gilbert CrossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Cusano v. KleinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Jeffrey M. Janes v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Dba Sam's Club, and Gary DawesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Adams v. California Department of Health ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Adams v. California Department of Health ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- (CONSENT)(PS) Grasty v. San Juan Unified School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020