Millet v. Pullman Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
CHASEZ, Judge.
Plaintiff, Isidore Millet,, a porter and long-time employee of defendant, The Pullman Company, filed two suits for workmen’s compensation claiming that he was totally and permanently disabled as a result of two separate incidents.- The cases were consolidated for. trial and appeal. In the first suit the court below awarded maximum benefits. The second suit was dismissed on the grounds that plaintiff had failed to prove the occurrence of the incident on which it was based.
*238Defendant took an appeal with regard to the first judgment contending that any claim in that suit had…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mottet v. Libbey-Owens-Ford Glass Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
- Circello v. Haas & Haynie Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1959
- Wynn v. Standard Roofing Co., IncLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ancor v. Belden Concrete Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
- MacIas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Funderburk v. Calcasieu Paper Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
- Millet v. Pullman Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
- Millet v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1966