Legal Opinion

Millet v. Pullman Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 6, 1965No. 1948PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHASEZ, Judge.

Plaintiff, Isidore Millet,, a porter and long-time employee of defendant, The Pullman Company, filed two suits for workmen’s compensation claiming that he was totally and permanently disabled as a result of two separate incidents.- The cases were consolidated for. trial and appeal. In the first suit the court below awarded maximum benefits. The second suit was dismissed on the grounds that plaintiff had failed to prove the occurrence of the incident on which it was based.

*238Defendant took an appeal with regard to the first judgment contending that any claim in that suit had…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mottet v. Libbey-Owens-Ford Glass Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
  2. Circello v. Haas & Haynie Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Wynn v. Standard Roofing Co., IncLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ancor v. Belden Concrete Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
  2. MacIas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  3. Funderburk v. Calcasieu Paper Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Millet v. Pullman Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. Millet v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API