Legal Opinion
Boisvert v. Sears, Roebuck & C o .
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided March 24, 1998No. CV-96-495-MPublished
1Opinion of the Court
Boisvert v . Sears, Roebuck & C o . CV-96-495-M 03/24/98 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Jeanie T . Boisvert v. Civil N o . 96-495-M Sears, Roebuck & C o . O R D E R Plaintiff, Jeanie Boisvert, brought suit pursuant to Title VII, 42 U.S.C.A. § 2000e, against her former employer, Sears, Roebuck & Co., alleging discrimination in Sears’s decisions to terminate her employment and not to rehire her. Sears moves for summary judgment on grounds that Boisvert did not file her administrative complaint in a timely fashion, and alternatively, because Boisvert cannot show…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Wardair Canada Inc. v. Florida Department of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States Department of Justice v. JulianSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Jimmie E. Woods v. Friction Materials, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Carl Kale v. Combined Insurance Company of America, Carl Kale v. Combined Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.