Sansom Committee v. Lynn
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1DissentGarth, Circuit Judge
Chief Judge Seitz’s attempt, laudable in itself, to enable the parties involved in a complex controversy to forge a lasting and equitable peace, stands on untenable footing. The limited jurisdiction that federal courts possess does not encompass the enforcement of consent judgments against or in favor of parties whose rights the court had no power to adjudicate in an involuntary proceeding. Because a majority of this court holds otherwise, I respectfully dissent.
I
The appeal taken by the University of Pennsylvania in this case asserts that the district court had no subject matter jurisdiction…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.