Legal Opinion

Hellams v. Prior

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 21, 1902PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Before Benet, J., Laurens, October, 1901. Foreclosure by Hellams & Gray against H. G. Prior. John W. Carlisle, as executor of Simpson Bobo, intervened by petition and was made a party defendant, and in his answer sets up an equitable mortgage against the lands in question, his testator being the assignee of E. M. Cooper, who sold the land originally to Prior, and who had given him bond for title.

Read the full summary

Before Benet, J., Laurens, October, 1901. Foreclosure by Hellams & Gray against H. G. Prior. John W. Carlisle, as executor of Simpson Bobo, intervened by petition and was made a party defendant, and in his answer sets up an equitable mortgage against the lands in question, his testator being the assignee of E. M. Cooper, who sold the land originally to Prior, and who had given him bond for title. At instance of Carlisle, executor, the heirs at law of Cooper were also made parties defendant. The following is the Circuit decree: “On January 1, 1873, E. M. Cooper sold the defendant, Prior, the…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Gary.

The facts of this case are set forth in the decree of his Honor, the Circuit Judge, which will be reported. The reasons assigned by the Circuit Judge and the authorities cited by him, are satisfactory to this Court in disposing of the questions presented by the pleadings.

It is the judgment of this Court, that the judgment of the Circuit Court be affirmed.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harn v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Edwards v. JohnsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911
  3. McCauley v. Northern Texas Traction Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  4. Fanning v. BogackiSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1919
  5. Jones v. Haile Gold Mining Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API