Legal Opinion
Matovski v. Gonzales
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 15, 2007No. 05-4534PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*725GWIN, D. J., delivered the opinion of the court in which, MERRITT, J., joined. BATCHELDER, J. (pp. 740-43), delivered a separate dissenting opinion.
OPINION
GWIN, District Judge.
I. Overview
With this case, Petitioners Ljupco Ma-tovski and Violeta Matovska, his wife, (together, the “Matovskis”) seek review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) that found them de-portable. Petitioners say they qualify for employment-based permanent resident status. The Respondent, United States Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales, disagrees.
The Matovskis are natives and citizens of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Aguirre-AguirreSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Rolando Augustine Castellano-Chacon v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Succar v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Zheng Zheng v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Pankajkumar Patel v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
- Battle Creek Health System v. LeavittCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Shashikant Patel v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Servs.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Herrera v. US Citizenship and Immigration ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Karimi-Janaki v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.