Pritz v. Jones
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, Patrick- Jones and another, and by the defen dant-Peter Doelger, respectively, from two separate interlocutory judgments of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiffs, entered in the office of the clerk, of -the county of New York on the 31st day of July, 1906, upon the decision of the' court, rendered after a trial at the New York Special Term, overruling the said defendants’ demurrers to the complaint. .. ~
1Concurrence
Ingraham, J. (concurring):
I concur with Mr. Justice Clarke that, for the reasons stated, no cause of action is alleged against the defendant Doelger, but I do hot concur in his conclusion that a causé of action is stated'as against the defendants Jones and Moran. I can find mo "allegation that the transfer of the business by Belford to Jones and Moran was made to hinder, delay or defraud creditors, or that Jones and Moran purchased the property with that intent. The substance of the allégation is that Jones and Moran purchased the property of Belford for $1,950, and that that property,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gould v. . Cayuga County National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Kley v. . HealyNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Kley v. . HealyNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Kley v. HealyNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894