Peltz v. Carolina Bagging Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
HULBERT, District Judge.
Defendant moves for an order to inspect and copy certain documents, books and records. Plaintiff resists the application upon the general ground that the moving papers do not show “good cause” as required by Rule 34, Federal Rules of *444Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, and specifically objects to certain items.
The action was brought to recover damages in the sum of $126,000 for alleged breach of contract whereby defendant agreed to give Textile Corporation of America an exclusive agency to sell certain rugs manufactured by it. Plaintiff who is, or was,…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Callen v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
- Schmidt v. Vision Service PlanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025