Legal Opinion

Martin v. LOUISIANA FARM BUREAU CAS. INS.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided July 5, 1994No. 94-C-0069PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

638 So.2d 1067 (1994)

Bruce MARTIN

v.

LOUISIANA FARM BUREAU CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.

No. 94-C-0069.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

July 5, 1994.

Raymond C. Jackson, III, Allen & Gooch, Harry Alston Johnson, III, Michael B. Wallace, for applicant.

Louis D. Bufkin, McHale, Bufkin & Dees, for respondent.

Ann Elizabeth DeGroff Levine, Eugene Peter Urbanowicz, Jr., Richard W. Bussoff, Perry Roger Staub, Jr., for amicus curiae, Ochsner Health Plan (OHP).

WATSON, Justice.[1]

The issue is whether a health and accident insurer, which pays its insured's medical expenses after an automobile accident, is…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hoefly v. Government Employees Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
  2. State v. BarrasSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  3. Fertitta v. Allstate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1985
  4. Orleans Parish School Board v. Pittman Construction Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1972
  5. Pringle-Associated Mortgage Corporation v. EanesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bellard v. American Cent. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
  2. Cleco Corp. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
  3. Copeland Enterprises, Inc. v. Slidell Memorial Hosp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
  4. Berlier v. AP Green Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
  5. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. v. BerthelotSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API