Stiner v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal from City Court of New York. Action by Edgar F. Stiner against the Metropolitan Street Railway Company and another. From a judgment in favor of plaintiff, and from an order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial, defendants prosecute separate appeals. Affirmed.
1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, P. J.
The action was brought to recover damages tor personal injuries sustained by the plaintiff through the alleged concurrent negligence of the servants of both defendants. While the plaintiff was a passenger in a cab owned and operated by the defendant Kayton, and while the cab was in the act of crossing Madison avenue at a point about 100 feet north of Ninety-Second street, it came into collision with a north-bound car of the defendant railway company, and the plaintiff was injured thereby. The jury rendered a verdict against both defendants, and they appeal separately.
The plaintiff was free…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Loudoun v. . Eighth Ave. R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Zimmer v. Third Avenue RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Keegan v. Third Avenue RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
- Zimmer v. Third Avenue RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Regensburg v. Nassau Electric RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Thoreson v. New York State RailwaysNew York Supreme Court · 1916