Legal Opinion

United States v. Michael Schnittker

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided December 2, 2015No. 14-4905PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge WILKINSON wrote the opinion, in which Judge SHEDD and Judge WYNN joined.

WILKINSON, Circuit Judge:

This appeal involves the application of the Double Jeopardy Clause when a criminal defendant pleads guilty to one crime in an indictment and elects to go to trial on the other. Appellant Michael Schnittker appeals his conviction for receipt of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2). Schnittker argues that his prosecution and conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2) should have been barred by the Fifth Amendment’s Double Jeopardy Clause because…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Missouri v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Ohio v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. United States v. BenoitCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. United States v. Robert FallCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
  2. United States v. Juan Ortiz-OrellanaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024
  3. United States v. Daryl BankCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
  4. Jason Bell v. J. StreevalCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2025
  5. Maillet v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2020

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API