William Crace v. Northrop Grumman Ship Systems
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM: *
William Paul Crace appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Huntington Ingalls, Incorporated, formerly known as Northrop Grumman Ship Systems, Inc. We affirm.
I
Huntington Ingalls contracted to build a ship for the United States Navy. Crace worked for a subcontractor responsible for inspecting the ship prior to it being commissioned and delivered to the Navy. While attempting to inspect a lower compartment on the ship, Crace ducked under a chain, went down a hatch, and began to descend a ladder. He fell from the ladder and was injured.
Crace alleged that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Boyle v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Stewart v. Dutra Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Roy Bufkin, Jr. v. Felipe's Louisiana, LLCSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2014
- Edward L. Lowe v. Ingalls Shipbuilding, a Division of Litton Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Curtis Michael Richendollar, Cross-Appellant v. Diamond M Drilling Company, Inc., Cross-Appellee and Baker Shipyards, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Muir v. Sasol Chemicals U S A L L CDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2020