Legal Opinion

Crossett Lumber Co. v. United States

District Court, W.D. Arkansas

Decided July 31, 1948No. Civ. A. 453PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN E. MILLER, District Judge.

Formal findings of fact and conclusions of law have been filed with the clerk of the court, -in which the facts are set out in detail, and upon which, judgment for the plaintiff has been entered. Learned counsel for the respective parties have earnestly and ably tried the case and have filed thorough and exhaustive briefs in support of their contentions. There is no material dispute as to the facts, but there is a sharp disagreement as to the law to be applied, and for this reason the court feels that it should briefly state the reasons that impelled it to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Hearst Publications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. United States v. SilkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Bartels v. BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Illinois Tri-Seal Products, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  2. Frank v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  3. Metropolitan Roofing & Modernizing Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1954
  4. Loeb v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1962
  5. Associated Bicycle Service, Inc. v. United States (In Re Associated Bicycle Service, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API