Fitzgerald v. Brown, Smith & Marsh Bros.

(after stating the facts as above.) We agree with the trial court that the testimony .did not show a valid gift to Rachel J. Moore by F. A. Moore of his interest in the real property referred to in the statement above, and therefore overrule the contention of appellant to the contrary.

But we do not agree with said court in his. conclusion that an effect of the service of the writ of garnishment was to create a lien in appellees’ favor on the money in appellant’s hands as trustee, and to entitle appel-lees to have same applied toward the satisfaction of their .judgment against F. A. Moore.

The…