Shaw v. Rowland
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Clay District Court. At the September Term, 1883, plaintiff Rowland recovered a judgment against Shaw and two others, for $255.65 and interest and costs. The defendants Shaw and Farrell bring the case here. The opinion states the nature of the action, and the facts.
1Opinion of the Court
*155The opinion of .the court was delivered by
Hurd, J.:
This case has once before been before this court, and remanded for a new trial. (29 Kas. 438.) The substance of the petition, as well as most of the facts in the case, are stated in that opinion, and need not be repeated here.
Shaw and Earrell, defendants, answered the petition as follows:
“First Defense: The defendants J. M. Shaw and George Earrell, answering for themselves alone, deny each and every allegation contained in the petition.
“Second Defense: The said defendants J. M. Shaw and George Farrell, answering for themselves alone, for a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cohen v. TrowbridgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
- Bury v. ConklinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
- Rowland v. ShawSupreme Court of Kansas · 1883
3Cited by9 opinions
- Godfrey v. ValentineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- Bowman v. HazenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Rea v. ReaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- First National Bank of Newton v. Wm. B. Grimes Dry Goods Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1891
- Ponca Milling Co. v. StevensSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.