Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Kent

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided October 20, 1925PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Clay

Affirming.

This is an appeal from a judgment sustaining Mrs. Olivia Veech Kent’s claim to certain rights of way over adjoining lands.

After a careful consideration of the record we have reached the conclusion that the chancellor’s decision was correct. As the facts and applicable principles of law are fully stated and ably discussed in the chancellor’s opinion, we adopt his 'opinion as the opinion of this court. His opinion is as follows:

“By his will, Richard S. Veech divided his 'Beargrass Farm’ into four tracts and devised one of them to his son, Bethel B.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rowan's Ex'rs v. Town of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1847
  2. Lebus v. BostonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
  3. Henry v. KochCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1882
  4. Irvine v. McCrearyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1900
  5. O'Daniel v. BaxterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1901

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lightfoot v. BeardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  2. Cary v. Pulaski County Fiscal CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2013
  3. Fidelity & Columbia Trust Co. v. HarkleroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  4. Lane v. RaileyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  5. Stouse v. First Nat. Bank of ChicagoCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API