Garvin v. Garvin

Plaintiff in Error, plaintiff below, brings this case here by writ of error to review the action of the trial court in vacating an order requiring defendant in error to .pay $25.00 a month for support of a fourteen year old son of the contesting parties, who formerly were husband and wife, and in cancelling delinquent payments in the sum of $87.50. Reference will be made to the parties as they appeared in the action for divorce in which defendant in error was defendant.

Plaintiff received a final decree of divorce February 5, 1929, at which time the son was two years old, and defendant was…