Legal Opinion

Gooley v. Conway

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided May 23, 1978No. 77-1121C(2)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

WANGELIN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs brought this action seeking reinstatement with back-pay from the date of their termination as St. Louis city employees. They seek to proceed as class representatives of all those persons similarly situated. The complaint is based upon the allegations set out below.

Plaintiffs Gooley, Hemphill and Casey all applied for employment with the City of St. Louis in 1977. Case was hired as a refuse collector in April of 1977. Gooley was hired as a laborer with the Parks Division, and Hemphill was hired as a street sweeper, both in July of 1977. All of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Continental Research Corp. v. TrainDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dane R. Hayward v. Curtis L. HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  2. Gooley v. ConwayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
  3. Gooley v. ConwayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API