Legal Opinion
Carver v. Plyer
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 12, 2004No. 04-1076UnpublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANTWERPEN, Circuit Judge.
Jean Carver (“Carver”) and Charles Kimble Booz (“Appellants”) brought suit against Quakertown Borough, two Quaker-town Borough policemen, St. Luke’s Hospital, and two of its employees (“Appellees”) under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Appellants alleged that Appellees detained and treated Carver without her consent in violation of her due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment. The District Court entered summary judgment in favor of the hospital and its employees. 1 Appellants now assert that the District Court abused its discretion in failing to give them notice…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Blum v. YaretskySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Rose v. BartleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Robertson v. Allied Signal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Bass v. Parkwood HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- McLaughlin v. Forty Fort BoroughDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Giaccone v. Canopius U.S. InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
- Van Orden v. Borough of WoodstownDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
- Davis v. Township of PaulsboroDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2006
- Rodney Stanley v. Virgin Islands Bureau of CorrectionsSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2020
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.