United States v. Laulette Marie Love
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:
Defendant Laulette Love challenges the lower court’s imposition as a condition of supervised release that she pay restitution previously ordered by a North Carolina federal district court. We conclude that the imposition of the condition was proper and affirm.
I
In 2001, defendant Laulette Love pleaded guilty in Louisiana district court to one count of attempted and two counts of completed credit card fraud. As part of her plea agreement, she agreed to pay restitution in accordance with the Victim and Witness Protection Act (VWPA) 1 and the Mandatory…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Witte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. Edward Rodriguez, A/K/A Rick, Thomas J. Albernaz, Peter Smigowski, and William John MartinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. David S. BokCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- United States v. MaturinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. WeathertonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. VarroneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- United States v. MannCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. TalbertCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.