Legal Opinion

Paul John Carbo and Joseph Sica v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 15, 1966No. 20150Published

1Per curiam

After numerous unsuccessful appeals to this court on various phases of their indictment, trial and conviction, 1 this appeal is taken from the denial of a § 2255 motion in the district court.

We find no merit in this appeal. We adopt certain language used by the trial judge in denying the motions below:

“It appears to me indisputably shown that there is not the slightest basis in fact for the contentions made in the Carbo and Sica motions under 28 U.S.C. 2255. And I further find and hold that, assuming any possible interpretation of my July 17, 1964 remarks most favorable to petitioner’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Paul John Carbo, Frank Palermo, Joseph Sica, Louis Tom Dragna, and Truman K. Gibson, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  2. Carbo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  3. Paul John Carbo, Frank Palermo, Joseph Sica and Louis Tom Dragna v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  4. Paul John Carbo v. United States of America, Joseph Sica v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  5. Paul John Carbo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API