In re Potee Brick Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
In the matter of Potee Brick Company of Baltimore City, bankrupt. Proceedings to determine the rights of the Curtis Bay Company, landlord, as against James O. Dickinson, mortgagee of the bankrupt’s property. Judgment for the Curtis Bay Company.
1Opinion of the Court
ROSE, District Judge.
In this opinion, for brevity, the Curtis Bay Company of Anne Arundel county will be spoken of as the “landlord”; the Potéé Brick Company of Baltimore City will be called the “bankrupt” ; and. James O. Dickinson and Robert Moss, his attorney and assignee, will be called the “mortgagee.”
The questions which are now to be decided relate to the relative rights of the landlord, the bankrupt’s estate, and the mortgagee to certain property which now and at the time of the filing of the petition in bankruptcy were on the property which the bankrupt held as tenant of,-the landlord.
■…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Attorney-General v. LowellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1892
- Bleakley v. . SullivanNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Beers v. FieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1897
- O'Brien v. MuellerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1902
- Simpson Brick Press Co. v. WormleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Teater v. Good Hope Development Corp.California Supreme Court · 1939
- Universal CIT Credit Corporation v. Congressional Motors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Patterson v. BroachDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1932
- Seay v. McCaugheyDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1934
- In re McCoyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1934