Union Collection Co. v. Spencer
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from orders of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco denying payment of an assigned claim settling a final account and directing distribution. J. V. Coffey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.
J. C. O’Connor, doing business as J. C. 0 ’Connor & Co., presented to the administratrix of the estate of Patrick Cummins, deceased, a claim for two hundred and fifty-one dollars for funeral expenses, and on March 4, 1893, it was allowed by the administratrix and approved by the probate judge, and filed as an approved account against the estate. On February 9, 1900, O’Connor assigned said claim to the Union Collection Company, and notice of the assignment was given to the administratrix. It was shown by oral evidence at the trial that the assignment was made to the collection company to…
2Cited by9 opinions
- In re Stinger EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1921
- Starke v. WannemacherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
- Estate of GirardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Hill v. HillArizona Supreme Court · 1931
- In Re Bielenberg's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.