Legal Opinion
Village of Ossining v. Lakin
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 12, 1957PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJames W. Bailey, J.
Application by defendant Ruby R. Dixon for leave to open her default in pleading and for permission to interpose an answer.
Plaintiff acquired title to the premises as the result of an in rem foreclosure in the year 1951. The premises were thereafter dedicated for park purposes. In March of 1956 by legislative enactment plaintiff was authorized to discontinue the use as a park of a portion of the premises to enable plaintiff to convey such portion to the State of New York for a State armory. The State of New York refused to sanction the in rem title of the village whereupon this action was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Brooklyn Park Commissioners v. ArmstrongNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Williams v. . GallatinNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- In re the Assessment of the Cost & Expense of the Improvement of Central ParkwayNew York Supreme Court · 1931
- Selzer v. BakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Morrill Realty Corp. v. Rayon Holding Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sheridan Suzuki, Inc. v. Caruso Auto Sales, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1981
- City of Rochester v. CarnahanNew York Supreme Court · 1967