Heydt-Benjamin v. Heydt-Benjamin

In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant *1168appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Nicolai, J.), dated June 2, 2010, as granted the plaintiffs motion for temporary custody of the two subject children, denied that branch of her cross motion which was to dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and, in effect, denied that branch of her cross motion which was for an award of pendente lite maintenance and an attorney’s fee.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrar…