Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ullom v. Arkansas Department of Human Services

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided June 16, 1999No. CA 98-601Published

1DissentSam Bird, Judge

I respectfully dissent from the prevailing decision, which affirmed the trial court, because I do not believe that the evidence clearly ánd convincingly supports the chancellor’s conclusion that appellants abused their child or that any other ground exists for the termination of appellants’ parental rights.

The trial court appears to have concluded that there was clear and convincing evidence to support three grounds for granting the petition to terminate the appellants’ parental rights:(1) that [the child] was dependent-neglected as a result of unexplained abuse or neglect that could endanger…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Donna S. v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API