Legal Opinion

J. Michael Kummerer v. C. Richard Marshall

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 26, 2012No. 03A01-1201-CT-33PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VAIDIK, Judge.

Case Summary

J. Michael Kummerer appeals the trial court’s failure to award him prejudgment interest and its failure to grant his motion to correct errors. He contends that the decision to deny him prejudgment interest was contrary to law because contract damages could be determined by simple mathematical calculations. He also contends that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion to correct errors because the trial court did not make any findings of fact about whether damages were able to be determined by simple calculations before denying him…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Olcott International & Co. v. Micro Data Base Systems, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Noble Roman's, Inc. v. WardIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Tracy v. MorellIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Bennett v. BroderickIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. Hayes v. ChapmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. ACF 2006 Corp v. Timothy DevereuxCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  2. Wesco Distribution, Inc. v. Arcelormittal Indiana Harbour Llc. and Espu, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Dennis Larson, Rose Real Estate, Inc., and Diversified Commercial Real Estate v. Peter N. KaraganIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. Dana Companies v. Chaffee RentalsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Meridian Mutual Insurance Company, n/k/a State Automobile Mutual Insurance Company v. Majestic Block & Supply, Inc., n/k/a Tutewiler CorporationIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API