Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Florida Bar v. Maas

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 16, 1987No. 67854Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partGrimes, Justice

In view of the referee’s report, I believe the respondent should be suspended for at least some period of time and that his right to resume the practice of law should be conditioned upon the payment of the restitution. Other cases involving neglect in the handling of estates have also resulted in suspensions. The Florida Bar v. Windham, 380 So.2d 1294 (Fla.1980); The Florida Bar v. Shannon, 376 So.2d 858 (Fla.1979); The Florida Bar v. Zyne, 248 So.2d 1 (Fla.1971).

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. ShannonSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  2. Florida Bar v. ZyneSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  3. Florida Bar v. WindhamSupreme Court of Florida · 1980