Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Daniel

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 20, 1917No. 7856PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Certiorari; from Murray superior court—Judge Fite. August 23, 1916.

1Opinion of the CourtWade, C. J.

1. According to the allegations in the petition for certiorari, which were admitted by the answer of the magistrate to be correct, suit was brought in a justice’s court on an account against “H. H. Anderson, administrator,” which was by permission of the court amended to read, against “H. H. Anderson, as administrator,” without more; and “at the appearance term defendant filed a plea denying any indebtedness, and a plea of set-off, alleging that the plaintiff was due the estate of Mrs. J. C. Morris.” Judgment was apparently rendered against H. H. Anderson as administrator of the estate of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lamar v. LamarSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Wadley v. OertelSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  3. Dorsey v. BlackSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
  4. Pryor v. LeonardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
  5. Humphrey v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Neely v. MobleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  2. Interstate Bond Co. v. Phœnix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API