Legal Opinion

Mills v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 5, 2006No. 1D05-5725Published

1Per curiam

Petitioner’s direct appeal was dismissed when no response was received to an order requiring payment of the filing fee and completion of a docketing statement. We grant the petition for belated appeal and hereby reinstate the appeal in case number 1D05-0386. See Hardy v. State, 822 So.2d 553 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (holding that appellate counsel’s failure to file a *943docketing statement and respond to this court’s order to pay the filing fee constituted ineffective assistance of appellate counsel and granting a petition for belated appeal). Pugh v. State, 793 So.2d 1100 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001).…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hardy v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  2. Pugh v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API