Legal Opinion

United States v. Roy M. Bloom, Philip Polishook, Roy M. Bloom, Inc. And K. Polishook & Son Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 11, 1956No. 24040_1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATERMAN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from convictions for using the mails to defraud. Count I of the four count indictment charged Roy M. Bloom, Roy M. Bloom, Inc., Philip Polishook, and K. Polishook & Son Corp. with conspiring in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 with Murray Kraut (named as a co-conspirator but not indicted) to engage by use of the mails in a fraudulent “count the diamonds” prize winning contest, entitled “Diamond Puzzle.” Counts II, III, and IY charged Bloom individually with causing the “contest” circulars to be mailed to three specific addresses in violation of 18 U. S.C.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Quercia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Durland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. STANTON v. Embrey, AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. Standard Oil Co. of NJ v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Domenico Bando, A/K/A 'Nick Bando,' Leo Telvi and Gondolfo Miranti, A/K/A 'Shiekie,'Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  2. Patricia Louise Moody v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  3. United States v. Charles Di CanioCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API