Legal Opinion

Rose v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 13, 1944No. 22992PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is theft of property over the value of five dollars and under the value of fifty dollars. The punishment assessed is confinement in the county jail for a period of thirty days and a fine of thirty dollars.

Appellant’s first complaint is that the evidence is insufficient to sustain his conviction. The State’s testimony shows that on the 9th day of February, 1944, Mrs. Sukel took a bronze Baby Ben clock to the appellant’s place of business to have it cleaned; that appellant looked at the clock and agreed to do the work for $4.50 and requested her to come back on the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pritchard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  2. Wimberly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. Brumbelow v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Wilkerson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Patterson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cage v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1958
  2. Fouke v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. Rodriguez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2007
  4. Hammonds v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
  5. Cage v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API