Legal Opinion

Lucio v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 15, 1996No. 96-51PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

673 So.2d 195 (1996)

Albert Alexander LUCIO, Appellant,

v.

The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 96-51.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

May 15, 1996.

Albert Alexander Lucio, in pro per.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Wanda Raiford, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before NESBITT, COPE and FLETCHER, JJ.

2Per curiam

The denial of appellant's motion for postconviction relief is affirmed. The amount of credit in the sentencing order for time served through the date of sentencing is correct. This ruling is without prejudice to appellant to take such steps as may be necessary to…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barber v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. Bowles v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  3. Riddell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. Holland v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  5. Cameron v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. Salazar v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  2. Cordova v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  3. West v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  4. Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  5. Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API