Legal Opinion

Hidalgo v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 2, 1968No. 66-769Published

1Per curiam

The record of appellant’s conviction fails to support the judgment and sentence because of the State’s failure to prove an essential element of the crime charged. See § 811.20 Fla.Stat. (1965), F.S.A. The State, in its brief and upon oral argument, recognizes the fatal deficiency. Therefore, the judgment and sentence must be reversed *630upon authority of the law as established in Lasher v. State, 80 Fla. 712, 86 So. 689 (1920); Farrior v. State, Fla.1954, 76 So.2d 148; Johnson v. State, Fla.App.1958, 102 So.2d 412; Patterson v. State, Fla.App.1964, 167 So.2d 766.

Reversed, with directions to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Farrior v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  2. Lasher v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  3. Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  4. Patterson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API