Legal Opinion

Pettit v. Morton

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 16, 1928No. 9003Published

1Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, PJ'.

The vital question is whether a court of equity,, under the unprobated will, can declare a trust on the ground of fraud, and in that manner ultimately have declared invalid the will in favor of the heirs at law, duly probated under the statute, and under which occupancy, possession and rents and profits ensue?

In Seeds v. Seeds, 156 N.B. 193, the Supreme Court held that an heir at law might maintain an action in equity to have a devisee under a forged will, fraudulently admitted to probate, declared a trustee ex maleficio, even after the statutory time for contesting the will…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Case of Broderick's WillSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Gaines Et Ux. v. ChewSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
  3. Hunter's WillOhio Supreme Court · 1834

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API