Legal Opinion

Ex parte Flannagans

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided May 7, 1875No. Case No. 4,855PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUGHES, District Judge.

The questions to be decided are these, viz.: 1st Were the shipments of this fertilizer under the contract of December (ith, 1S72, a mere consignment on a del credere guarantee, or were they on sale? 2d. If on sale, did the shipments pass the whole property in the fertilizer to the Chamberlaines, or was there a special property reserved constituting in favor of the Flannagans a preferred claim upon the proceeds of the fertilizer in the hands of the Chamberlaines? •

1st It is clear that the contract of December 6th, 1872, did not provide for consignments to the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reiter v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  2. Commercial Credit Co. v. Girard National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  3. Commonwealth v. Thorne, Neal & Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API