Legal Opinion · Concurrence

In Re Miller

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 28, 2011No. 9 WAP 2010Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Saylor

I join the majority’s holding that a parent has standing to challenge the appointment of a limited guardian for her minor child’s estate. See Majority Opinion at 427, 434-35, 27 A.3d at 988, 992-93. Notably, neither party to this appeal disagrees with this well-established proposition. See, e.g., Brief for Appellant at 7; Brief for Appellee at 4. Under the circum*436stances, I believe it would be useful to provide some additional context explaining how it is that we have come to revisit a settled point of law with which all parties agree.

The main difficulty in the case seems to stem from the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API