Legal Opinion

Pringle v. Neff, Exctx.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 23, 1933No. Appeal 91PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

The plaintiff recovered a judgment in the common pleas court against the defendant executrix for work and labor alleged to have been furnished by plaintiff to the defendant’s testatrix; defendant, having appealed, complains of the refusal of her motions for a new trial and for judgment n. o. v.

The plaintiff sought to recover from the executrix the value of work and labor furnished by him to his aunt, Catherine McKain, during a period extending from February, 1926, to May, 1931. In support of his claim he offered evidence tending to show that he was a coal miner living…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. In re Estate of FultonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  2. Stegmaier v. Keystone Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  3. Tarentum Lumber Co. v. MarvinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  4. Nickle v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1842
  5. Hall v. WoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Solar Electric Corp. v. Exterminator Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Crew Levick Co. v. GibbonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Kelly EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Whalen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Brown's EstatePennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API