Legal Opinion

Whitson v. Haniel-Clark & Son

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 11, 1923No. 14212PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

“ The mere fact that there are eoniliets in the testimony-does not render the direction of a verdict in favor of a party erroneous, when it appears that the conflicts are immaterial, and that, giving to the opposite party the benefit of the most favorable view of the evidence as a whole and of all legitimate inferences therefrom, the verdict against him is demanded. Sanders Mfg. Co. v. Dollar Savings Bank, 110 Ga. 559.” Skinner v. Braswell, 126 Ga. 761 (2) (55 S. E. 914). Under the principle announced above the court did not err in directing a verdict in favor of the defendant.

Judgment…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sanders Manufacturing Co. v. Dollar Savings BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  2. Skinner v. BraswellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Berger v. Georgia Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  2. Oliver v. WayneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API