Bayfront Medical Center, Inc. v. Jones
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
OTT, Judge.
The trial court, sitting as a court in probate, ruled that the pleading of the appellant was, in effect, a petition to revoke probate and not having been filed within six months of the notice of probate was therefore barred. Section 732.28, Florida Statutes (1973). We disagree and therefore reverse. Since we reverse, the applicability of the doctrine of dependent relative revocation becomes important on remand. This point was extensively briefed and argued in this court. We hold the doctrine applicable for the reasons hereafter discussed.
In September 1965, Emma Jones executed a…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re Wilmott's EstateSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
- Second Church of Christ, Scientist, of New York City v. KaufmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Linkins v. Protestant Episcopal Cathedral Foundation of the District of Columbia Williams v. Protestant Episcopal Cathedral Foundation of the District of Columbia Stone v. Protestant Episcopal Cathedral Foundation of the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Stewart v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
- Watts, Sr. v. Newport in Re: Graham EstateSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re JonesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977