Legal Opinion
Kaupke v. Lemoore Canal & Irrigation Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 26, 1937No. Civ. 1812PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment whereby plaintiff recovered from defendant $4,162.75 principal, together with interest and attorneys ’ fees.
Plaintiff is water master under provisions of the contract dated May 3, 1927, signed by defendant and eighteen other corporations and irrigation districts. This contract defined the rights of the signers, except the Foothill Irrigation District, in waters of the Kings River and is called “Water Right Indenture”. The Foothill Irrigation District, while it executed the instrument, seems to have asserted no rights under it.
This water right indenture fixed…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Furlow Pressed Brick Co. v. Balboa Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
- Egan v. BishopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Front Street, Mission & Ocean Railroad v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- Fresno Canal & Irrigation Co. v. PerrinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Southern Pacific Railroad v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Verdier v. VerdierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Alameda Produce Market, Inc. v. Air Nail Co. (In Re Air Nail Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- Colaco v. Cavotec SA, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- County of Santa Clara v. VargasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Harper v. Poortinga CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021