Legal Opinion

Calhoun v. City of Chicago

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided April 8, 2011No. 10 C 0658PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STATEMENT

JOAN B. GOTTSCHALL, Judge.

This ease involves excessive force and false arrest claims against two Chicago police officers and the City of Chicago, brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants have asked the court to enter a protective order, and plaintiff Joseph Calhoun has raised two specific objections. First, Calhoun asks the court to strike a provision of the proposed order (“Review Provision”) that requires Calhoun to submit certain police complaint files (known as “Complaint Registers” or “CRs”) to defendants for review thirty days in advance of any public release. If a dispute…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bond v. UtrerasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  2. Wiggins v. BurgeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Martin v. ConnerDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
  2. Gutherless v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2021
  3. Hague v. Union Pacific Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2021
  4. In re Broiler Chicken Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2026
  5. Lane v. Prairie State Generating Company, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API