Legal Opinion

Rothenfluch v. Department of Revenue

Oregon Tax Court

Decided January 3, 1990No. TC 2819PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARL N. BYERS, Judge.

Clackamas County corrected the tax rolls for omitted property for the years 1981-82, 1982-83 and 1983-84. Plaintiffs petitioned defendant for relief from such action. Defendant dismissed plaintiffs’ petition and plaintiffs appeal.

Plaintiff Gerald Rothenfluch (Gerald) and his brother, Dean Rothenfluch (Dean), purchased the subject land in the name of D & G Enterprises in 1977. In 1980, an office building and two 2-bedroom duplexes were built on the property. A second office building was constructed the following year. In 1985, Dean conveyed his undivided one-half interest…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. California & Oregon Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. United States v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Johnson v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Liquid Air Inc. v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1979

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schellin v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 2000
  2. Mahler v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1990
  3. Glancy v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1991
  4. Rothenfluch v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API