Legal Opinion

Williams v. United States

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 4, 1952No. 28870-EPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROCHE, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff has brought this action under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346, 2671 et seq.,' to recover damages for injuries sustained through the negligence of an intoxicated soldier. The negligence and plaintiff’s injuries are not disputed by the defendant. The sole question for decision is whether the soldier was acting within the course and scope of his employment within the purview of the Tort Claims Act. Its determination requires a careful examination of the facts, as disclosed by the record. From the evidence of defendant’s witnesses, all of whom testified…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. SharpeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
  2. Murphey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  3. Long v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1948

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Althea G. Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
  2. United States v. Lushbough Hoffman v. LushboughCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952
  3. Althea G. Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  4. Rodriguez v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1971
  5. Marquardt v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API