Legal Opinion

Constance S. v. Saul

District Court, E.D. Illinois

Decided August 8, 2019No. 18 C 0059PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Jeffrey Cole, United States Magistrate Judge

Plaintiff applied for Disability Insurance Benefits ("DIB") under Title XVI of the Social Security Act ("Act"), 42 U.S.C. §§ 416(i), 423, about five years ago. (Administrative Record (R.) 165-67). She claimed that she became disabled as of August 1, 2013 (R. 165, 191), due to a lower back impairment, diabetes with neuropathy, hypertension, and poor vision. (R. 194). Over the ensuing three years, plaintiff's application was denied at every level of administrative review: initial, reconsideration, administrative law judge (ALJ), and appeals council.…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Marlin SARCHET, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  3. Cheryl Beardsley v. Carolyn ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  4. Melissa Varga v. Carolyn ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  5. O'Connor-Spinner v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. La Bruyere v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API