Legal Opinion

Rohlfing v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 1949No. 28,506PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJasper, J.

Appellant was charged by affidavit with receiving stolen goods under § 10-3017, Burns’ 1942 Replacement. He was tried by jury, convicted, and sentenced.

The record discloses that a search warrant was issued, and that, prior to the trial, an amended verified motion to quash the search warrant and suppress the evidence was filed. A hearing was held on the amended verified motion and it was overruled by the court.

Appellant presents only two questions before this court under his specifications raised in his motion for a new trial: (1) The alleged error of the court in overruling appellant’s…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Steele v. United States No. 1Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Giles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1922
  3. Grau v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Worthington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1948
  5. Wallace v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1927

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. The People v. SaikenIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Johns v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Kinnaird v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Ashley & Taylor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Watt v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API