Cooper v. Amerada Hess Corp.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALARID, Judge.
{1} This case requires us to decide where venue lies in a common-law environmental action involving multiple defendants. The trial court, believing that the action involved an interest in land located in Lea County, ruled that venue was improper in Santa Fe County and dismissed the entire case. As we explain more fully below, although Plaintiffs’ claims arise out of alleged injury to real property, Plaintiffs’ claims nevertheless are transitory claims for purposes of our general venue statute. Applying our general venue statute, we affirm in part, and reverse in part.
BACKG…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Livingston v. JeffersonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Virginia · 1811
- Seaboard Rice Milling Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- C.E. Alexander & Sons, Inc. v. DEC International, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- Williams v. Board of County CommissionersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1998
- Kalosha v. NovickNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cooper v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
- Amparano v. Asarco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Kaywal, Inc. v. Avangrid Renewables, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019
- Toscano v. LovatoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
- Toscano v. LovatoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.